Relevance and determinants of farm mechanization in the diverse geographic context of Nepal

Bibek Panta, Ram P. Pandey, Binod Ghimire, Nisha Neupane

Abstract


This study assessed the overall scenario of mechanization in different ecological zones of Nepal and identified determinants of mechanization. A perception-based semi-structured questionnaire survey was conducted in four districts, each in Terai and Hills of Lumbini province, Nepal. Index ranking method and descriptive statistics were used to rank farmers' perceptions of factors affecting adoption, problems, and the impact of mechanization. A multiple linear regression model (OLS) was used to analyze determinants of farm mechanization, and the model was tested for normality, multicollinearity, and heteroscedasticity. The average machinery used per household in the study area was 1.68, and 58% of the machinery purchased was in grant support from the government. Extension service is a major source of information for adoption, and cost reduction is a major reason for using machines in farming. Most surveyed farmers responded that cost has decreased and production has increased with the use of machinery. Pollution, repair and maintenance, fuel supply, and lack of training are the few problems associated with mechanization. The study showed that the provision of subsidy, ecological zone (Terai region), total land, economically active members in the household, and distance from extension service were positively significant. In contrast, family size and membership in groups and cooperatives were negatively significant with the adoption of farm machinery. Effective extension service, Grant support program, establishment of custom hiring center, distribution of woman-friendly machines, and establishment of service centers in remote areas along with distributing machines recommended by the research center are important recommendations for enhancing the adoption of mechanization. 


Keywords


Mechanization; OLS regression; adoption; custom hiring; extension services

References


Acharya, P., Regmi, P. P., Gauchan, D., Bahadur, D., and Bahadur, G. 2020. Comparative study on technical efficiency of mechanized and traditional rice farm in Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 3(2): 82–91

Akram, M. W., Akram, N., Wang, H., Andleeb, S., Ur Rehman, K., Kashif, U. and Hassan, S. F. 2020. Socioeconomics determinants to adopt agricultural machinery for sustainable organic farming in Pakistan: A multinomial probit model. Sustainability, 12(23): 9806.

Amare, D. and Endalew, W. 2016. Agricultural mechanization: Assessment of mechanization impact experiences on the rural population and the implications for Ethiopian smallholders. Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(2): 39–48.

Arun, G. C., Yeo, J.-H. and Ghimire, K. 2019. Determinants of farm mechanization in Nepal. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(1): 87–91.

Aryal, J. P., Maharjan, S. and Erenstein, O. 2019. Understanding factors associated with agricultural mechanization: A Bangladesh case. World Development Perspectives, 13: 1–9.

Aryal, J. P., Thapa, G. and Simtowe, F. 2021. Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey. Technology in Society, 65: 101591.

Bhandari, P. and Ghimire, D. 2016. Rural agricultural change and individual out‐migration. Rural Sociology, 81(4:, 572–600.

Chaudhary, D. 2018. Agricultural policies and rural development in Nepal: An overview. Research Nepal Journal of Development Studies, 1(2): 34–46.

Daum, T. and Birner, R. 2020. Agricultural mechanization in Africa: Myths, realities and an emerging research agenda. Global Food Security, 26: 100393.

Devkota, R., Pant, L. P., Gartaula, H. N., Patel, K., Gauchan, D., Hambly-Odame, H., Thapa, B. and Raizada, M. N. 2020. Responsible agricultural mechanization innovation for the sustainable development of Nepal’s hillside farming system. Sustainability, 12(1): 374.

DoAD. 2022. Yearly Progress and Statistical Book. Directorate of Agriculture Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Land Management, Lumbini Province Government.

Emmanuel, B. O. and Maureen, N. T. 2021. Investigating heteroscedastic disturbances in some transformed economic models while eliminating multicollinearity. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 6(5): 1–7.

Gauchan, D. and Shrestha, S. 2017. Agricultural and rural mechanisation in Nepal: status, issues and options for future. In Rural Mechanisation:A Driver in Agricultural Change and Rural Development. Institute for Inclusive Finance and Development (InM).

Ghimire, B., Dhakal, S. C., Marahatta, S. and Bastakoti, R. C. 2023. Technical efficiency and its determinants on lentil (Lens culunaris) production in Nepal. Farming System, 1(3): 100045.

Ghimire, B. G. B., Chandra, D. S., Sharma Sujeeta, S. S., and Poudel P. S. 2018. Factors affecting adoption of sustainable soil management practices among vegetable producers in Dhading, Nepal. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13.

Ghosh, B. K. 2010. Determinants of farm mechanization in modern agriculture: A case study of Burdwan districts of west Bengal. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(12): 1107–1115.

Hormozi, M. A., Asoodar, M. A. and Abdeshahi, A. 2012. Impact of mechanization on technical efficiency: A case study of rice farmers in Iran. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1: 176–185.

Huan, M., Dong, F. and Chi, L. 2022. Mechanization services, factor allocation, and farm efficiency: Evidence from China. Review of Development Economics, 26(3): 1618–1639.

Kapri, K. and Ghimire, S. 2020. Migration, remittance, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from the Nepal Living Standard Survey. World Development Perspectives, 19: 100198.

Karki, E., Sharma, A. and Brown, B. 2022. Farm mechanisation in Nepal’s Terai Region: Policy context, drivers and options. Journal of International Development, 34(2): 287–305.

Kennedy, I. 2022. Sample size determination in test-retest and Cronbach alpha reliability estimates. British Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(1): 17–29.

Khumbulani S. N. K., Akwasi A, M. and Rubhara, T. 2020. Determinants of use of farm mechanization services in emerging farmers, north west province, South Africa. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 56(2): 221–228.

MoALD. 2014. Agriculture Mechanization Promotion Policy 2014. Ministry of Agriculture & Livestock Development, Government of Nepal.

MoALD. 2022. Statistical information on Nepalese Agriculture 2077/78 (2020/21). Ministry of Agriculture & Livestock Development, Government of Nepal. https://moald.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/statistical-Information-on-nepalese-agriculturE-2077-78.pdf

MoF. 2022. Economic Survey 2021/22. Ministry of Finance, Government of Nepal. https://www.mof.gov.np/uploads/document/file/1674635120_Economic_Survey_2022.pdf

Mohammed, K., Batung, E., Saaka, S. A., Kansanga, M. M., and Luginaah, I. 2023. Determinants of mechanized technology adoption in smallholder agriculture: Implications for agricultural policy. Land Use Policy, 129: 106666.

NSO. 2021. National Population and Housing Census 2021 (National Report). National Statistics Office, Government of Nepal. https://censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/results/downloads/national

NSO. 2023. National Sample Census of Agriculture Nepal 2021/2022 National Report. National Statistics Office, Government of Nepal.

Omotilewa, O. J., Ricker‐Gilbert, J. and Ainembabazi, J. H. 2019. Subsidies for agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from a randomized experiment with improved grain storage bags in Uganda. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 101(3): 753–772.

Owombo, P. T., Akinola, A. A., Ayodele, O. O. and Koledoye, G. F. 2012. Economic impact of agricultural mechanization adoption: Evidence from maize farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Biodiversity Research, 1(2): 25–32.

Panta, B., Bhandari, T. and Paudel, B. 2020. Soil erosion vulnerability and adaptation strategies in maize field of Sindhukhola sub-watershed region, Nepal. SN Applied Sciences, 2: 1–12.

Park, A. G., McDonald, A. J., Devkota, M. and Davis, A. S. 2018. Increasing yield stability and input efficiencies with cost-effective mechanization in Nepal. Field Crops Research, 228: 93–101.

Pingali, P. 2007. Agricultural mechanization: adoption patterns and economic impact. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 3: 2779–2805.

PMAMP. 2020. Project Implementation Manual. Prime Minister Agriculture Modernization Project, Government of Nepal`.

PMAMP. 2023. Agricultural Mechanization: inventory, expenditure & outcome (Fy 2079/80). Prime Minister Agriculture Modernization Project, Government of Nepal`. https://pmamp.gov.np/sites/default/files/2023-07/PMAMP INVENTORY BOOK 2080.pdf

Shrestha, S. 2012. Status of agricultural mechanization in Nepal. United Nations Asian and Pacific Center for Agricultural Engineering and Machinery (UNAPCAEM).

Shrestha, S. 2022. An overview of agricultural mechanization in Nepal. Kathmandu University Journal of Science Engineering and Technology, 16(2).

Sims, B. and Kienzle, J. 2017. Sustainable agricultural mechanization for smallholders: what is it and how can we implement it? Agriculture, 7(6): 50.

Takeshima, H. and Justice, S. E. 2020. Evolution of agricultural mechanization in Nepal. IFPRI Book Chapters, 285–325.

Tiwari, S. and Bhattarai, K. P. 2011. Migration, remittances and forests: disentangling the impact of population and economic growth on forests. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5907.

Tuladhar, R., Sapkota, C. and Adhikari, N. 2014. Effects of migration and remittance income on Nepal’s agriculture yield (ADB South Asia Working Paper Series). Asian Development Bank. https://www.shram.org/uploadFiles/20170615120930.pdf

Vortia, P., Nasrin, M., Bipasha, S. K. and Islam, M. M. 2021. Extent of farm mechanization and technical efficiency of rice production in some selected areas of Bangladesh. GeoJournal, 86: 729–742.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.012.002.5237

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Bibek Panta, Ram Prasad Pandey, Binod Ghimire, Nisha Neupane

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.