Potential of Eucalyptus camaldulensis for agro forestry and energy plantation on problem soils
Abstract
Pakistan is facing an energy and water crisis, and on the other hand, the prominent acreage of land is unsuitable for the cultivation of crops because of salinity and waterlogging. Thus, eucalyptus could be the most suited option in those soils which are currently unused. This study was conducted in Mochiwala plantation (Chak 178/JB) having normal soil and Shorkot irrigated forest plantation having saline and water-logged soil situated in district Jhang. The major objectives of the study were to explore the potential of eucalyptus species for agroforestry and energy plantation on problem soils. For this study, successive surveys were conducted to collect data from the farmers regarding the agro-forestry potential of eucalyptus. Whereas, calorific values of the wood samples were calculated through the bomb cylinder and bucket technique. Further, the thermal properties of the wood samples were also examined. The findings indicated that Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus camaldulensis), Farash (Tamarix aphylla), Kikar (Vachellia nilotica) and Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo) were the dominating species cultivated by the farmers for agroforestry purposes. About 72.5% of respondents had cultivation of these trees around the boundary of their land. Agro-forestry was significantly contributing economically to the farmers as they were getting Rs. 40000/- to Rs. 50000/- per annum from these trees in addition to major crops i.e. rice, Moong, Wheat and Corn. The highest calorific value of Eucalyptus camaldulensis is reported as 4900 K. cal/gm in normal soil, 4909 K. cal/gm in treated saline soil and 4750 K. cal/gm in treated water-logged soil. This implies that treated saline and treated waterlogged soils have strong potential for energy plantations.
Keywords
References
Bennett, S. J., E. G. Barrett-Lennard and T. D. Colmer. 2009. Salinity and waterlogging as constraints to saltland pasture production: A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 129: 349-60.
Cavalett, O., S. Norem Slettmo and F. Cherubini. 2018. Energy and Environmental Aspects of Using Eucalyptus from Brazil for Energy and Transportation Services in Europe. Sustainability, 10: 4068.
Cullen, P. 2003. Salinity. In Ecology – An Australian Perspective (eds P.M. Attiwill & B.A. Wilson), pp. 474–488. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia. Place Published.
Doughty, R. W. 2000. The Eucalypts. A Natural and Commercial History of the Gum Tree Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA. Place Published.
Feikema, P. M., J. D. Morris and L. D. Connell. 2010. The water balance and water sources of a Eucalyptus plantation over shallow saline groundwater. Plant and Soil, 332: 429-49.
Hardiyanti, A. Umar, Makkarennu, S. Millang and B. Putranto. 2021. Contribution of agroforestry on farmers’ income in Mapilli Polewali Subdistrict, West Sulawesi Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 886: 012027.
Kassie, G. W. 2017. Agroforestry and farm income diversification: synergy or trade-off? The case of Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 6.
Kawarasaki, S. H., H. Hamano, S.-i. Aikawa, H. Utsugi, M. Saito, H. Tanouchi, T. Kojima and K. Yamada. 2010. Growth of Trees Planted for Rehabilitation of a Saline Area of the Wheatbelt in Western Australia. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ, 44: 37-43.
Kidanu, S., T. Mamo and L. Stroosnijder. 2005. Biomass production of Eucalyptus boundary plantations and their effect on crop productivity on Ethiopian highland Vertisols. Agroforestry Systems, 63: 281-90.
Peck, A. J. and T. Hatton. 2003. Salinity and the discharge of salts from catchments in Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 272: 191-202.
World Bank. 2006. Carbon finance at the World Bank. http://carbon-finance.org/ accessed Dec. 20, 2007. Place Published.
Zada, M., S. Zada, M. Ali, Y. Zhang, A. Begum, H. Han, A. Ariza-Montes and L. Araya-Castillo. 2022. Contribution of Small-Scale Agroforestry to Local Economic Development and Livelihood Resilience: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province (KPK), Pakistan. Land, 11: 71.
DOI: 10.33687/ijae. 010.01.4097
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Nasim Iqbal But
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.