1. Home
  2. Special Issue 01 | Issues of Legal Regulation in Agrarian and Tourism Space
  3. Lytvynenko

Transformation of the paradigm of entrepreneurial activity innovative development in the pandemic conditions

Sergiy Lytvynenko, Oleksandr Tregubov, Yulia Prykhno, Nataliia Yakymova, Igor Panchenko, Yuliia Popova

Abstract


The relevance of the topic is determined by the importance of innovative development for business entities under conditions of turbulent changes in the environment. The purpose of the article is to identify the preconditions and content of transforming the paradigm of entrepreneurial activity innovative development due to the spread of COVID-19. The historical evolution of innovative theories and concepts was analyzed, which allowed systematizing the achievements. It was determined that modern methodological bases of the problem are formed on the basis of educational concepts and the general theory of innovation. The characteristic of the “innovation” definition was supplemented by a fifth advantage, which is the ability to identify commercially successful innovations, as well as identify shortcomings of each of the definitions. The set of applications and tools of enterprises’ innovation groups has been improved by partial specification and supplement. The contribution of other authors to the theory of innovation and transforming the paradigm of entrepreneurial activity innovative development was determined and systematized. Materials of the article may be relevant for use by managers of enterprises, government officials, researchers, graduate students and doctoral students.

Keywords


entrepreneurial activity; innovative development; pandemic; theories of innovation

References


Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. And Gambardella, A. 2003. Markets for Technology and Corporate Strategy. In Economics, Law and Intellectual Property. Boston: Springer. pp. 77-108.

Ayres, R.U. 2004 On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economic diverge. Ecoloical Economics, 48(4): 425–438.

Baumol, W. 2005. Education for Innovation: Entrepreneurial Breakthroughs Versus Corporate Incremental Improvements. National Bureau of Economic Research, 5: 33-56.

Boichenko, E., Martynovych, N., and Shevchenko, I. 2021. Cognitive modeling concepts of sustainable development of society. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 16(2): 158-165.

Bond-Smith, S. 2019. The impact of compatibility on innovation in markets with network effects. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(3): 816-840.

Britchenko, I., and Saienko, V. 2017. The perception movement economy of Ukraine to business. Economic Studies journal, 26(4): 163-181.

Cardillo, A., Zanin, M., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., del Amo, A. J. G. and Boccaletti, S. 2013. Modeling the multi-layer nature of the european air transport network: Resilience and passengers re-scheduling under random failures. European Physical Journal, 215: 23–33.

Cook, G. N., and Goodwin, J. 2008. Airline Networks: A Comparison of Hub-and-Spoke and Point-to-Point Systems. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education Research, 17(2): 51-59.

Diermeier, D., Hopp, W. J. Iravani, S. 2007. Innovating under Pressure: Towards a Science of Crisis Management. Innovation Policy and the Economy. In National Bureau of Economic Research. Massachusetts: Cambridge, The MIT Press, 7: 125-154.

Dykan, V., Pakharenko, O., Saienko, V., Skomorovskyi, A., and Neskuba, T. 2021. Evaluating the efficiency of the synergistic effect in the business network. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 8(1): 51-61.

Forman, C., Goldfarb, A. and Greenstein, S. 2014. Information Technology and the Distribution of Inventive Activity , NBER Working Paper No. 20036. Retrieved from: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w20036/w20036.pdf

Freeman, R. 2006. Does Globalization of the Scientific/Engineering Workforce Threaten U.S. Economic Leadership? Innovation Policy and the Economy. In National Bureau of Economic Research. Massachusetts: Cambridge, The MIT Press, 6: 123-158.

Fukuda, K. and Watanabe, C. 2012. Innovation Ecosystem for Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development - Policy and Urban Development - Tourism, Life Science, Management and Environment. Retrieved from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/29237

Guimerà, R., Mossa, S., Turtschi, A. and Amaral, L. N. 2005. The worldwide air transportation network: Anomalous centrality, community structure and cities' global roles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102: 7794–7799.

Hrosul, V., Kovalenko, S., Saienko, V., Skomorovskyi, A., Kalienik, K., and Balatska, N. 2021. Research of logical contradictions in the conditions of cluster management of the enterprise. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 24(1): 1-4.

Innovation, development and COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities and ways forward (2020) Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/innovation-development-and-covid-19-challenges-opportunities-and-ways-forward-0c976158/

Malueg, D. A. and Schwartz, M. 2006. Compatibility incentives of a large network facing multiple rivals. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 54 (4): 527–567.

Norbäck, P.-J. and Persson, L. 2010. Entrepreneurial Innovations, Competition and Competition Policy. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1926145 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926145

Norbäck, P.-J., Persson, L. and Tåg, J. (2014). Acquisitions, entry, and innovation in oligopolistic network industries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37(C):1–12.

Pertuz, V. and Pérez, A. 2021. Innovation management practices: review and guidance for future research in SMEs. Management Review Quarterly, 71(1): 177-213.

Pianta, M. 2017. Innovation and economic change. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(8): 683-688.

Piekkola, H. and Rahko, J. 2019. Innovative growth: the role of market power and negative selection. Economics of innovation and new technology, 29(6): 603-624.

Siedschlag, I. and Zhang, X. 2015. Internationalisation of firms and their innovation and productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(3).

Sridhar, B., and Sheth, K. 2008. Network Characteristics of Air Traffic in the Continental United States. IFAC Proceedings, 41(2): 13109-13114.

Verma, T., N. Araújo, A. M. and Herrmann, H. J. 2014. Revealing the structure of the world airline network. Scientific Reports, 4: 5638.

Yezersky, G. 2007. General Theory of Innovation Overview. Retrieved from: https://triz-journal.com/an-overview-of-the-general-theory-of-innovation


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.010.00.3853

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Sergiy Lytvynenko, Oleksandr Tregubov, Yulia Prykhno, Nataliia Yakymova, Igor Panchenko, Yuliia Popova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.