INNOVATION PLATFORM: METHOD TO ENGAGE CROP-LIVESTOCK STAKEHOLDERS IN WEST AFRICA
With an objective to understand the process on how can research (ers) in innovation platforms contribute in engaging crop-livestock stakeholders in mixed –farming systems of the semi-arid tropics of West Africa, five innovation platform meetings were initiated by the International Crop Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) together with national research institutes: Centre for Dryland Agriculture, Bayero University, Nigeria and Institut National de Recherche Agronomique du Niger between February to October, 2014. The trans boundary transect between Nigeria and Niger called as Katsina Kano and Maradi (KKM) five villages was purposively selected as action site. Apart from innovation platform methodology, mixed methods using quantitative and qualitative methods like- structured questionnaires, focused group discussions, interviews (semi structured, face to face, unstructured) with farmers and stakeholders; direct observations, information from participants in various meetings and discussions during innovation platform meetings and site visits were undertaken. Following the analytical framework of innovation methodology data was coded and characterized to identify the role of researchers in innovation platforms to contribute in engaging crop-livestock stakeholders in mixed –farming . Results indicated that research and innovation platforms can engage stakeholders for a win –win situation. Demand driven research strengthens innovation platforms: researchers work is better informed, more systematic and more authentic. Researchers help in understanding in the Innovation platforms challenges faced by different stakeholders, through diagnostic exercises, visioning, and needs assessment. Platforms strengthen research by feedback so that it is more likely to be adopted. Researchers contribute to innovation platforms through traditional research, b) by knowledge management and action research; c) enabling environment; d) network brokering and mobilising funds. However, researchers face constraints associated with innovation platforms sustainability because of fixed budgets, staff time and resources. For sustainability of innovation platforms it should governed locally.
Boogard, B., M. Schut., L. Klerkx.,C. Leeuwis., A. Duncan and Beth Cullen. (2013). Critical issues for refelection when desigining and implementing research for development in innovation platforms.
Tui, H.K. S., A. Adekunle., A. Lundy.,J. Tucker., E.Birachi., L.Klerkx., P.Ballantyne; A. Duncan., J. Cadilhon and Mundy, P. (2013). What are IPs? Brief 1 of IP practice briefs by CGIAR research program on the Humid tropics. Kenya: ILRI. Available from: http://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/33667.
Lema, Z. and M.Schut. 2013. Research and innovation platforms. Innovation platforms practice brief 3 by CGIAR research program on Humid tropics: Kenya. ILRI.
Nederlof, S., M.Wongtschowski and F. Van der Lee (eds.). (2011). Putting heads together : agricultural IPS in practice .Bulletien 396. Amsterdam: KIT publishers.
Singhal, Arvind and Dearing, JW. (2012). Communication of Innovations. A Journey with Ev Rogers. Editors Arvind Singhal and James W. Dearing 2012 p34..Sage Publications India Private Limited.
Varma, S., Evans, A., C.da Silva Well, and K.Jinapala. (2009). Attitude and actions of participants in multistakeholder processes and platforms. Knowledge Mgt for Dev. J. 5:3,201-214.
World Bank. (2006). Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. Washington DC, p. 135.
Yee, S. (2010). Stakeholder engagement and public participation in environmental flows and river health assessment. Australia-China environment development partnership.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Sapna Jarial, Hakeem A. Ajeigbe, Shehu Yahaya, Salissou Issa, Mamman K. Nouri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.