TRANSFER STUDENTS AND THE MISMATCH HYPOTHESIS

Joseph A. Soares, Kelly Watson

Abstract


This study uses the National Longitudinal Study of Freshman to analyze the different factors that affect a student’s decision to transfer from an NLSF institution. Several arguments against affirmative action rest on the assumption that minority students are more likely to leave selective institutions if admitted. This analysis found no evidence to support claims that that race plays a role in transfer decisions. The study provides the counterintuitive finding that students who did not feel self-conscious about their race were more likely to transfer. This study found no support for the mismatch hypothesis at the institutional or individual level.


Keywords


Race; transfer students; mismatch hypothesis; affirmative action

Full Text:

PDF XPS

References


Allen, J., Robbins, S.B., Casillas, A., & In-Sue, O. (2008). “Third-Year College Retention and Transfer: Effects of Academic Performance, Motivation, and Social Connectedness.”Research in Higher Education 49.7: 647-664.

Sigal, A., & Tienda, M. (2005). “Assessing the ‘Mismatch’ Hypothesis: Differences in College Graduation Rates by Institutional Selectivity.” Sociology of Education 78.4, 295-315.

Antonovics, K. L., & Sander, R.H. (2009). “Affirmative Action Bans and the ‘Chilling Effect.’” American Law and Economics Review 15.1: 252-299.

Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Dai, L. (2010). “They Need Help: Transfer Students from Four-Year to Four-Year Institutions.” Review of Higher Education 33.2: 207-238.

Espenshade, T. J., & Chung, C. Y. (2005). “The Opportunity Cost of Admissions Preferences at Elite Universities.” Social Science Quarterly 86.2: 293-304.

Espenshade, T. J., Chung, C. Y., & Walling, J.L. (2004). “Admission Preferences for Minority Students, Athletes, and Legacies at Elite Universities. Social Science Quarterly 85.5 (2004): 1422-46.

Goldrick-Rab, S., & Pfeiffer, F. T. (2009). “Beyond Access: Explaining Socioeconomic Differences in College Transfer.” Sociology of Education 82.2: 101-125.

Grutter v. Bollinger, (2003). 123 S. Ct. 2325.

Massey, D. S., Charles, C. Z., Lundy, G. F., & Fischer, M. J., (2003). The Source of the River: The Social Origins of Freshmen at America’s Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Massey, D. S., Charles, C. Z., Mooney, M. A., & Fischer, M. J., (2009). Taming the River: Negotiating the Academic, Financial, and Social Currents in Selective Colleges and Universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, (2012). “Transfer and Mobility: A National View of Pre-Degree Student Movement in Postsecondary Institutions.”

Okun, M. A., Karoly, P., Martin, J.L., & Bensoff, A. (2008-2009). “Distinguishing Between Exogenous and Endogenous Intent-to-Transfer Students.” Journal of College Student Retention 10.4: 507-524.

Rhee, B.S., (2008). “Institutional Climate and Student Departure: A Multinomial Multilevel Modeling Approach.” The Review of Higher Education 1.2: 161-183.

Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A. (1997). America in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Wintre, M. G., & Morgan, A. S. (2009). “Transferring Post-Secondary Schools: Student Perceptions, Rationales, and Experiences.” Journal of Adolescent Research 24.6: 726-749.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 International Journal of Educational Studies

International Journal of Educational Studies
ISSN: 2312-458X (Online), 2312-4598 (Print)
© EScience Press. All Rights Reserved.