Enclosure Utilization and Enrichment Structure Preferences of Captive Coyotes

Jeffrey T. Schultz, Julie K. Young


Environmental enrichment improves well-being of captive animals using a variety of tools, including adding complexity to the physical environment. Designing enrichment structures requires an understanding of behavioral and biological responses to enrichment efforts. Captive coyotes (Canis latrans) utilize shelter structures to hide, rest, and display vigilant behavior. Because these simple structures are regularly used, new and more complex enrichment structures could enhance enclosure enrichment. This study examined the time captive coyotes spent at discrete, complex enclosure features to determine: (1) how coyotes utilize enclosure space and shelter structures; and (2) if coyotes have a preferred enrichment structure design. Three enrichment structure designs (ramp, closed, and neutral) were installed simultaneously in 0.6-ha enclosures during two breeding seasons (January – March). Additional coyote pairs were monitored in control enclosures with simple structures. GPS-collars and scan sampling were used throughout a 28-day testing period to record space use and behavior. Coyotes spent most of their time at perimeter and open areas, but also exhibited a preference for shelter structures. Coyotes utilized the complex enrichment structures in treatment enclosures more than simple structures in control enclosures. Although there was no statistical preference for one specific type of complex structure, composite evidence from GPS-collars and behavioral data suggested that coyotes were most frequently located at ramp structures. Coyotes utilized ramp structures more during the daytime and demonstrated higher rates of vigilance there. This study advances the knowledge of captive coyote spatial patterns while helping improve environmental enrichment planning for captive facilities through the exploration of adding complexity to animal enclosures.


Canis latrans; environmental enrichment; GPS collars; space use

Full Text:



Altmann, J., 1974. Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods. Behaviour 49, 227-266. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974x00534

Arias-Del Razo, I., Hernández, L., Laundré, J.W., Velasco-Vázquez, L., 2012. The landscape of fear: habitat use by a predator (Canis latrans) and its main prey (Lepus californicus and Sylvilagus audubonii). Canadian Journal of Zoology 90, 683-693. https://doi.org/10.1139/z2012-036

Arjo, W.M., Pletscher, D.H., 1999. Behavioral responses of coyotes to wolf recolonization in northwestern Montana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 1919-1927. https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-177

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Begg, C.B., Gray, R., 1984. Calculation of Polychotomous Logistic Regression Parameters Using Individualized Regressions. Biometrika 71, 11. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336391

Bekoff, M., Wells, M.C., 1981. Behavioural budgeting by wild coyotes: The influence of food resources and social organization. Animal Behaviour 29, 794-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(81)80013-9

Beyer, H.L., Haydon, D.T., Morales, J.M., Frair, J.L., Hebblewhite, M., Mitchell, M., Matthiopoulos, J., 2010. The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365, 2245-2254. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0083

Bloomsmith, M.A., Brent, L.Y., Schapiro, S.J., 1991. Guidelines for developing and managing an environmental enrichment program for nonhuman primates. Laboratory Animal Science 41, 372-377.

Bowers, M.A., Gregario, K., Brame, C.J., Matter, S.F., Dooley, J.L., 1996. Use of space and habitats by meadow voles at the home range, patch and landscape scales. Oecologia 105, 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00328798

Bowman, J.L., Kochanny, C.O., Demarais, S., Leopold, B.D., 2000. Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 141-145.

Brummer, S.P., Gese, E.M., Shivik, J.A., 2010. The effect of enclosure type on the behavior and heart rate of captive coyotes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 125, 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.04.012

Busk, P.L., Marascuilo, L.A., 2015. Statistical analysis in single-case research. Single-Case Research Design and Analysis (Psychology Revivals): New Directions for Psychology and Education, 159.

Frair, J.L., Fieberg, J., Hebblewhite, M., Cagnacci, F., DeCesare, N.J., Pedrotti, L., 2010. Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365, 2187-2200. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0084

Gese, E.M., Rongstad, O.J., Mytton, W.R., 1988. Home Range and Habitat Use of Coyotes in Southeastern Colorado. The Journal of Wildlife Management 52, 640. https://doi.org/10.2307/3800923

Gese, E.M., Ruff, R.L., 1997. Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors. Animal Behaviour 54, 1155-1166.

Gese, E.M., Ruff, R.L., Crabtree, R.L., 1996. Foraging ecology of coyotes (Canis latrans): the influence of extrinsic factors and a dominance hierarchy. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1139/z96-089

Gilbert-Norton, L.B., Leaver, L.A., Shivik, J.A., 2009. The effect of randomly altering the time and location of feeding on the behaviour of captive coyotes (Canis latrans). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120, 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.06.007

Gilbert-Norton, L.B., Wilson, R.R., Shivik, J.A., 2013. The Effect of Social Hierarchy on Captive Coyote (Canis latrans) Foraging Behavior. Ethology 119, 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12070

Grow, S., Allard, R., Luke, D., 2015. The Role of AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums in Butterfly Conservation, Butterfly Conservation in North America. Springer Netherlands, pp. 23-34.

Hansen, M.C., Riggs, R.A., 2008. Accuracy, Precision, and Observation Rates of Global Positioning System Telemetry Collars. Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 518-526. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-493

Harris, C.E., Knowlton, F.F., 2001. Differential responses of coyotes to novel stimuli in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 2005-2013. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-163

Hunter, S.C., Gusset, M., Miller, L.J., Somers, M.J., 2014. Space Use as an Indicator of Enclosure Appropriateness in African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus). Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 17, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.884401

Jensen, S.P., Gray, S.J., Hurst, J.L., 2003. How does habitat structure affect activity and use of space among house mice? Animal Behaviour 66, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2184

Kistler, C., Hegglin, D., Würbel, H., König, B., 2010. Structural enrichment and enclosure use in an opportunistic carnivore: the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Animal Welfare 19, 391.

Kluever, B.M., Gese, E.M., 2016. Spatial response of coyotes to removal of water availability at anthropogenic water sites. Journal of Arid Environments 130, 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.03.009

Kuczaj, S., Lacinak, T., Fad, O., Trone, M., Solangi, M., Ramos, J., 2002. Keeping environmental enrichment enriching. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 15.

Larsen, M.J., Sherwen, S.L., Rault, J.-L., 2014. Number of nearby visitors and noise level affect vigilance in captive koalas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 154, 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.02.005

Law, G., Reid, A., 2010. Enriching the lives of bears in zoos. International zoo yearbook 44, 65-74.

Lenth, R.V., 2016. Least-Squares Means: TheRPackagelsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software 69. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01

Lyons, J., Young, R.J., Deag, J.M., 1997. The effects of physical characteristics of the environment and feeding regime on the behavior of captive felids. Zoo Biology 16, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2361(1997)16:1<71::aid-zoo8>3.3.co;2-j

Mallapur, A., Qureshi, Q., Chellam, R., 2002. Enclosure Design and Space Utilization by Indian Leopards (Panthera pardus) in Four Zoos in Southern India. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0502_02

Mallapur, A., Waran, N., Sinha, A., 2005. Use of Enclosure Space by Captive Lion-Tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus) Housed in Indian Zoos. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 8, 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0803_2

Mellen, J., Sevenich MacPhee, M., 2001. Philosophy of environmental enrichment: Past, present, and future. Zoo Biology 20, 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1021

Mettler, A.E., Shivik, J.A., 2007. Dominance and neophobia in coyote (Canis latrans) breeding pairs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.03.012

Mills, L.S., Knowlton, F.F., 1991. Coyote space use in relation to prey abundance. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69, 1516-1521. https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-212

Newberry, R.C., 1995. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44, 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-z

Patterson, B., Bondrup-Nielsen, S., Messier, F., 1999. Activity patterns and daily movements of the eastern coyote, Canis latrans, in Nova Scotia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 113, 251-257.

Rafacz, M.L., Santymire, R.M., 2013. Using odor cues to elicit a behavioral and hormonal response in zoo-housed African wild dogs. Zoo Biology 33, 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21107

Renner, M.J., Lussier, J.P., 2002. Environmental enrichment for the captive spectacled bear (Tremarctos ornatus). Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 73, 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00786-4

Ross, S.R., Schapiro, S.J., Hau, J., Lukas, K.E., 2009. Space use as an indicator of enclosure appropriateness: A novel measure of captive animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.08.007

Samuelson, M.M., Lauderdale, L.K., Pulis, K., Solangi, M., Hoffland, T., Lyn, H., 2016. Olfactory Enrichment in California Sea Lions (Zalophus californianus): An Effective Tool for Captive Welfare? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 20, 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2016.1246362

Schell, C.J., Young, J.K., Lonsdorf, E.V., Mateo, J.M., Santymire, R.M., 2016. Olfactory attractants and parity affect prenatal androgens and territoriality of coyote breeding pairs. Physiology & Behavior 165, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.06.038

Sekar, M., Rajagopal, T., Archunan, G., 2008. Influence of Zoo Visitor Presence on the Behavior of Captive Indian Gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus) in a Zoological Park. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 11, 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700802330093

Shivik, J.A., Jaeger, M.M., Barrett, R.H., 1996. Coyote Movements in Relation to the Spatial Distribution of Sheep. The Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 422. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802245

Shivik, J.A., Palmer, G.L., Gese, E.M., Osthaus, B., 2009. Captive Coyotes Compared to Their Counterparts in the Wild: Does Environmental Enrichment Help? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 12, 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700902955989

Skaug, H., Fournier, D., Nielsen, A., Magnusson, A., Bolker, B., 2013. Generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R package version 0.7 7.

Team, R.C., 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2014.

Way, J.G., Ortega, I.M., Strauss, E.G., 2004. Movement and Activity Patterns of Eastern Coyotes In a Coastal, Suburban Environment. Northeastern Naturalist 11, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1656/1092-6194(2004)011[0237:maapoe]2.0.co;2

Wells, D.L., 2009. Sensory stimulation as environmental enrichment for captive animals: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.01.002

Wells, D.L., Hepper, P.G., 2000. The influence of environmental change on the behaviour of sheltered dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00100-3

Wells, M.C., Bekoff, M., 1981. An observational study of scent-marking in coyotes, Canis latrans. Animal Behaviour 29, 332-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(81)80093-0

Young, J.K., Andelt, W.F., Terletzky, P.A., Shivik, J.A., 2006. A comparison of coyote ecology after 25 years: 1978 versus 2003 This is Welder Wildlife Foundation contribution No. 651. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84, 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1139/z06-030

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33687/zoobiol.002.01.2336


Copyright (c) 2019 Jeffrey T. Schultz, Julie K. Young

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Zoo Biology
ISSN: 2706-9761 (Online), 2706-9753 (Print)
© EScience Press. All Rights Reserved.